Castle Clash - iOS Today: 0    Total Posts: 112309

Total:#5

Create Thread

[Discussion] Proposed changes to cc - igg review please!

[Copy link] 4/332

#1
Posted on 1/27/19 12:31:28 PM | Show thread starter's posts only

Many longtime players are losing interest due to the state of the game. Many of us have found the guild events most fun.  Here are some suggestions to keep the game interesting!
1)  make a resource that cannot be bought that is tied to guild events such as guild wars and fortress feud. People like team competition and when the rewards don’t matter people get bored and quit
2) change the guild war scoring system so that equal points are rewarded for the highest might bases so if a lower might or higher might player beats that base the points rewarded are the same. Guild wars is largely decided by who has more guild might which is boring. Skill, not who has more might should decide the outcome. This makes the game more fun. Could tier the rewards of gw based on might similar to fortress feud
3) update game rewards for all game modes every month to keep up with the resource demands of the game
4) change the guild rankings to be a more accurate reflection of reality. E.g. remove shard donation rankings which is meaningless, make a new ranking based on guild war scores, fortress feud scores etc to be updated after each guild event

For the sake of cc, I hope igg can make some if not all of the above changes to keep this game alive and interesting!

Signature
#2
Posted on 1/27/19 12:43:11 PM | Show thread starter's posts only

I’d also state we need more game progression and not new game modes. Should have new insane dungeons every 2 months to alternate with new hbm monthly. Many find insane dungeons to be the most fun and challenging aspect of this game. Lava 5 and infernal summit should be updated every 4 months with updates game rewards.

Signature
#3
Posted on 1/27/19 2:09:49 PM | Show thread starter's posts only

My thoughts;
1) Since items are now being sold in game I don't think IGG will exclude any resource from being sold.

2) I agree that the points awarded should not be determined by the might of the attacker, it is more difficult for a lower might account to accomplish what a higher might can, but I fear that past complaints will make this a difficult thing to accomplish.

3) Rewards do need to be update and I believe a suggestion or feedback thread will be going up on this subject shortly.  However a monthly revision is a bit overkill.  If the rewards are updated based on current requirements, no update should be required until something new is added or altered that changes the requirements significantly.

4) I don't see any issue with the ranking system and even if your suggestion were to be implemented, the ranking would still be very similar to the current one since might has an impact on those scores.  I do however think that the ranking system for GW & FF matchups should be addressed for more accurate matchups.

Signature

Follow IGG @Facebook.com/IGG    Follow CC @Facebook.com/CastleClash
#4
Posted on 1/28/19 12:50:44 AM | Show thread starter's posts only

This thread has been banned.

Signature
Viet nam
#5
Posted on 1/28/19 9:15:55 AM | Show thread starter's posts only

I think that instead of every month bringing out a new hero they should concentrate on the game itself. What happened to insane dungeons, they could have brought out insane 8 instead of the other one. They need to fix small issues and rewards for each game mode. If only they could take one month and fix the little things and not worry about a hero I am sure folks would be very happy with the game.

Signature
all life is precious, play nice, be nice and always smile!